Yuku free message boards

Man o Man, there is absolutely no problem with my comprehension of Urdu. I have translated the Urdu quotation correctly.

Hadarat (Mirza) answered; the nature's laws do not remain the same, but the Word of Khuda Talla (again this horrid word) is always true. Before Naturists (we think Mirza means Scientists) use to think that the sky (heaven) rotate and the earth (does not) rotate. But after research the results are different. It is not good to stick to something as Word of God. Human can not reach (understand) to the reality of everything. To deny miracles on the basis that we have never experienced such thing, is not a good practice. Human do not know all the Laws of the Nature.

Note from Compiler; correction the word not was omitted due to typo error, the sentence should be read as "Earth is static". (Badar V2 N4 P2)

1- Probably, those who think they are scoring brownie points should consider the first quotation I have given that Mirza was taught the meanings of the Quran, which were forgotten. You have to put these two quotes together. Above Mirza says Word of Allah SWT is always true. Then why he did not mentioned Quran and said that Science was wrong? He further said human can not reach to the reality of everything, once again he had the chance to say, that Quran has already established these facts in very clear terms. But he once again failed to mention.

2- I have given history of almost 400 years before Mirza; it was proven by Astronomers that Earth rotates. But Mirza said now (ab) the scientists think that the earth rotates. It is clear indication that he was referring to the Scientifics experiments done in his era, which are listed in my article.

3- Third point I correctly made is the link to the Old Testament, the idea, of static earth and rotating sky came from the Jewish scriptures, not from scientific evidence and experimentations. The Church in 16^th and 17^th century was still trying hard to suppress the scientific approach towards the fact that Earth Rotates. To save themselves humiliations due to the errors contained in the Bible.

4- Church completely ignored these facts disclosed in the Holy Quran, so did Mirza

5- I have given the example of Abd Allah ibn Mas'ud, to emphsised that the true meanings of the verses were known from the time of Prophet Muhammad SAW, which could only come from Prophet SAW himself.

6- They point completely missed by the critique that Mirza despite his lofty claims was no wiser. His silence on the Quranic evidence is deafening, which put his concoctions for Quranic knowledge in the right perceptive and proves that he was a fake. No knowledgeable Muslim would give an answer like this, on such a vital issue; especially ignoring the Quranic evidence which is repeated at different places in the Holy Quran.

7- Funnily it is not my understanding of Urdu these followers should be worried about; they should be worried about Mirza's knowledge of Urdu. He wrote "Tabai" could they care to mention what is "TAB" in Urdu?

When I will discuss the last part from the quotations, on the matter of Miraj and Isra, then we will see how the followers of Mirza will stick to the word of Mirza "Humans do not know all the Laws of the Nature." I am sure, all of sudden they will start to use the arguments in reverse. All I can say is that there is more then one way to fry the fish.

It was not given to a fake like Mirza, who has been proven a liar over and over again. I wish the followers open their mouths and prove to me how the revelations for the death of Mirza's brother and father can be from Allah SWT? Do they seriously believe that Allah SWT is capable of making such fundamental errors (nauzobillah) ? Ahhhh, but i know no follower of Mirza will open their mouth on the evidence displayed in my previous articles. The followers of Mirza should always remember, I have destroyed the credibility of Mirza first before exposing him furhter. Can somebody tell me, how a person who attribute white lies to Allah SWT can be righteous?

I suggest people should look at the evidence the way it is presented and the conclusions reached, based on the evidence and its analysis. Mirza has failed miserably to prove that he has the knowledge of the Quran on such a vital topic.

Mr. Du Piazza,

It seems you do live in cloud cuckoo land. First of all there is nothing wrong with my translation, or meaning I have derived from the quotations.

1- If you, so insist then please do tell us ; are Physicians responsible for the experiment on Earth rotations?

2- Do you know that in Urdu Tab is always used for the Physicians? Or do you have some other explanations for it?

3- You are confusing Physics with Physicians in Urdu. We are not deal with English meanings here.

4- Do you know Arabic, Mr. Foul mouth? If you do, have you ever heard an Arabic speaking individual saying "Taban"? Do you know the meaning of it?

5- Usually this field always is domain of Cosmologists or Astronomers, but not of physicians. But have it your way.

6- To cut the long story short, do you care to tell us which Scientist or Physician proved that World is Static, before the time of Mirza?

7- Who was proving that world rotate at the time of Mirza? Always remember he used the word (Ab) now. Or do you find this meanings wrong too? If you do please tell us what Ab means in Urdu?

8- Secondly please tell us, why he failed to mention Quranic verses? Did you failed to notice, the Molvi was reading his Tafsir of Quran. But strangely Mirza did not say anything about the Quran, but he started to talk about Static Earth according to Tabai, whatever that means. But then people like you wouldn't understand it or admit it.

9- You may have not paid attention to another absurdity of Mirza but I did off course notice it, Mirza said "Aik bat ko Khudai Qool jan ker pukta hojana durast nahi hai" So what was he talking about a " Allah SWT decree from Quran or what? Never you forget the discussion Molvi having was about the Quran. So what was the Qudai Qool? Mr. Piazza, I can still dig big holes through the stupidity of Mirza. You better not make it worst for your cult and yourself, I am more than capable to humiliate Mirza further on this point. You should always remember when I write something, I always have plenty in store, to take care any idiot like you.

"Better shutup before I start tearing apart your faith and your holy books completely"

10-Last but not least, my book is Quran, and my religion is Islam, I do not believe in any sect, they are strictly forbidden by Allah SWT in the holy Quran, my leader is Prophet Muhammad SAW. I suggest you should carry out your threat and start tearing apart my holy book the Quran.

I want you to do this ASAP; I just can not wait for you to prove categorically that you are a heretical kafir. I will consider it job done. Please do not disappoint us, do carry out your threat.

Give a day or two; I am going to show some more incredible lies and frauds of Mirza and your cult. The lies Kazzab associated with Allah SWT. I will see what would be your response. I will make sure, I urge you to comment on that article. Until then keep simmering, you can not do a thing, except curse and abuse in the foot steps of Mirza Kazzab.

To all my Muslims Brothers;

Mr. Du Paizza has proven that from now on anybody who dies a "Hadsati Moot" i.e. Accidental death should not be considered dead, that person is very much alive and kicking. Only when some one dies a " Tabai Moot" i.e. die of natural causes is dead, because Tabai means "PHYSICALLY" as TAB means "Physics" according to the Urdu Scholar Mr. Du Paizza and off course that idiot of Quadian.

Plus we should not forget from now on we should consider famous people like Copernicus, Galileo and even Aristotle as Physicists according to Mirza they were "Tabai" i.e. physicists.

Mr. Du Paizza considered Quran as Un Holy Book but he has no shame in calling the books that have ridiculous ideas like static earth in them as holy books i.e. Word of God.
No wonder Mr. Du Paizza, our esteem scholar of Urdu language, consider "Tadkirah" as a holy book, keeping in line with his thinking that holy books of the past contains errors like tadkirah.

We all can give a round of applause to our Esteem Scholar of Urdu.
That's all folks.